After years of low pay, tough working conditions, and few benefits, unionization is having a moment in the food and beverage industry. Workers at chains like Chipotle and McDonald’s are organizing unions at an unprecedented pace, likely due to added strain and financial difficulty induced by the pandemic. Costs for everything from food to gas are up, wages are stagnant, and that makes unionizing a seriously appealing prospect for underpaid workers.
This is especially true at Starbucks. The massive, Seattle-based coffee chain has seen a wave of unionization across the country, with workers in more than 60 locations in 14 states organizing unions. The company hasn’t exactly been welcoming of these new unions, and organizers say that Starbucks has engaged in a wide range of union-busting practices, from actively encouraging employees to vote against unionizing to allegedly firing workers who were involved with union organizing.
In the coming months, unionization at Starbucks will continue to be a hot topic, because the organizing effort shows no signs of slowing down. Here’s what you should know:
What’s the deal with unions?
A worker’s right to form a union was first enshrined into U.S. federal law in 1935, with the passage of the National Labor Relations Act. The Act stipulates that employers must, in good faith, bargain with an officially recognized union of its workers. Those unions may be recognized voluntarily, or through an election process that’s administered by the National Labor Relations Board, the government agency tasked with managing union elections and disputes between employers and workers.
What’s happening at Starbucks?
The current wave of unionization at Starbucks began in Buffalo, New York, where workers at two stores voted to unionize as Starbucks Workers United in December 2021. Though the union has not yet presented official demands to the company, one worker told Eater that he hopes the union will secure a $25 minimum wage for baristas, plus improvements to company-provided benefits like mental health care plans. As soon as the workers filed for a union election with the National Labor Relations Board, the governmental agency tasked with handling disputes between employers and unions, Starbucks asked the agency to delay the union vote. The NLRB rejected that request.
The push to unionize spread quickly, first to Starbucks locations in Boston, and now the union has announced plans to organize 60 stores across 19 states, including Arizona, Washington, Illinois, Florida, Ohio, Maryland, Virginia, and California. Not all of the campaigns have been successful, though — of three Starbucks locations in Buffalo, one voted against unionization. Each store has unionized individually, though Starbucks has asked the NLRB to require stores in the same geographical area to vote together.
How is Starbucks responding?
According to the union, Starbucks is strongly opposed to unionization efforts at its stores. In addition to asking the NLRB to delay the certification of the Buffalo union election results, the company also asked the agency to prohibit Starbucks workers from organizing their stores individually,